Contracts—Consistent Oral Condition Precedent To Written Merger Agreement Unaffected By Parol Evidence Rule

Authors

David R. Knoll

First Page

103

Document Type

The Court of Appeals Term

Rights

Abstract

Hicks v. Bush, 10 N.Y.2d 488, 180 N.E.2d 425, 225 N.Y.S.2d 34 (1962).

Recommended Citation

David R. Knoll, Contracts—Consistent Oral Condition Precedent To Written Merger Agreement Unaffected By Parol Evidence Rule, 12 Buff. L. Rev. 103 (1962).
Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/buffalolawreview/vol12/iss1/20