Buffalo Law Review
Article Title
Contracts—Consistent Oral Condition Precedent To Written Merger Agreement Unaffected By Parol Evidence Rule
First Page
103
Document Type
The Court of Appeals Term
Abstract
Hicks v. Bush, 10 N.Y.2d 488, 180 N.E.2d 425, 225 N.Y.S.2d 34 (1962).
Recommended Citation
David R. Knoll,
Contracts—Consistent Oral Condition Precedent To Written Merger Agreement Unaffected By Parol Evidence Rule,
12
Buff. L. Rev.
103
(1962).
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/buffalolawreview/vol12/iss1/20