Changing Patterns of Legal Representation in Divorce: From Lawyers to Pro Se
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-1-2003
Abstract
Governmental assistance for legal representation in civil cases is far greater in the United Kingdom than in the United States of America. This article explores the extent of legal support for low–income Americans, particularly in the area of family law. Examination of the data on self–representation across the United States and over time shows decreased reliance on lawyers. Drawing on institutional and individual perspectives, the article then explores why individuals choose to represent themselves in divorce. What do lawyers add to a divorce besides cost? The article suggests patterns of lawyering depending upon the lawyer and the resources of the client. While some pro se individuals may thrive in the divorce process without the need of a lawyer, others are disadvantaged by the lack of services available to them. The matching process between case needs and legal representation does not work.
Publication Title
Journal of Law and Society
First Page
137
Last Page
155
Recommended Citation
Lynn Mather,
Changing Patterns of Legal Representation in Divorce: From Lawyers to Pro Se,
30
J.L. & Soc'y
137
(2003).
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles/739
Comments
This record does not contain full text. If available, click on the "DOI" link to see where the full text of the item is located. If you are a UB student, or faculty or staff member and unable to access the full text at the link, try searching for the item in Everything Search (https://search.lib.buffalo.edu/discovery/search?vid=01SUNY_BUF:everything). If not available, request via Delivery+ (https://library.buffalo.edu/delivery/).